Participation in Climate Change Adaptation

Publication: Report
Citation: Hastrup, Andreas et al. 2015: Participation in Climate Change Adaptation. BASE Deliverable 5.3.

This report aims at investigating the participation process in climate change adaptation for 22 European BASE case studies. A description of participatory methods and a further analysis of 9 BASE case studies where there has been a deliberative adaptation process present are given. Based on the results presented, a set of recommendations to policy-makers and practitioners are given. The output from D5.3 will lead up to D5.5, in which a more detailed analytical description of the framework will be given and a meta-analysis of the empirical contents will be delivered.

Policy Coordination for National Climate Change Adaptation in Europe: All Process, but Little Power

Year 2020

Publication:Book Section

This book chapter explores how policies and policy-making perform to support climate change adaptation. It is part of the book: Adapting to Climate Change in Europe: Exploring Sustainable Pathways - From Local Measures to Wider Policies which is a scientific synthesis of a four-year project on adaptation activities in Europe (BASE). This book aims at ensuring sustainable solutions in adaptation to climate change. This chapter reflects on different tools which can support decision making for climate adaptation and that have been presented in other chapters of the book. It also discusses how current adaptation measures operate to enhance the capacity to respond to climate change impacts in a coherent manner across sectors. Ecologic Institute's Jenny Tröltzsch and Katriona McGlade contributed to this chapter.

Analyzing the Policy Framework for Climate Change Adaptation

Year 2018

Publication:Book Section

This book chapter provides an overview of climate change adaptation across Europe, from an interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary perspective, drawing on key findings from case study-based research on local climate change impacts and adaptation solutions, including an analysis of participatory, economic, and sociopolitical approaches, methodologies, and tools. Ecologic Institute's Jenny Tröltzsch contributed to this chapter.

The Diversity of Adaptation in a Multilevel Governance Setting

Year 2018

Publication:Book Section

Stelljes, Nico: Using Active Public Participation in the Co-development of Coastal Protection Strategies for a Touristic Beach City. Timmendorfer Strand, Germany. in: Ng, K., Campos, I., Penha-Lopes, G. (Eds.). (2016). BASE adaptation inspiration book: 23 European cases of climate change adaptation to inspire European decision-makers, practitioners and citizens. Lisbon: Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 122-125.

Using Active Public Participation in the Co-development of Coastal Protection Strategies for a Touristic Beach City

Timmendorfer Strand, Germany

Year 2016

Event:Workshop

Concluding four years of interdisciplinary collaboration and research the BASE project brought together representatives working on climate adaptation policy at EU and Member State level, as well as local practitioners for an interactive day on climate change adaptation in Brussels. The main focus of the workshop was a series of policy observations that emerged from research in the BASE project. As a result another policy recommendation was developed which is available for download.

Implementing the EU Adaptation Strategy - Practical Insights and Policy Recommendations

9 June 2016
Brussels, Belgium

Publication:Poster

Tröltzsch, Jenny; Benjamin Boteler; Katrina Abhold (2016): A Global Analysis of Adaptation Case Studies: State of the Art. Poster.

A Global Analysis of Adaptation Case Studies: State of the Art

Year 2016

Event:Conference

Vivienne Parry welcomed approximately 1700 attendees from over 100 countries to the fourth edition of Adaptation Futures 2016, one of the largest conferences ever held on climate change adaptation. The Bottom-Up Climate Adaptation Strategies (BASE) project was selected to be featured as a best practice project at the conference. BASE partners, among them Ecologic Institute, presented the project's research and tools in two sessions.

Adaptation Futures 2016

10 - 13 May 2016
Rotterdam, Netherlands

Publication:Policy Brief

BASE Consortium 2016: Key Policy Issues in Implementing and Evaluating the EU Adaptation Strategy. BASE Policy Brief # 4.

Key Policy Issues in Implementing and Evaluating the EU Adaptation Strategy – BASE Policy Brief # 4

BASE Policy Brief No. 4

Year 2016

Publication:Report

This report takes stock of adaptation planning and measures to date in Europe and globally. Case studies for assessment were selected based on criteria developed in line with the key principles and objectives of BASE. The report provides a general assessment of 136 selected case studies focusing on aspects including types of measure, stakeholder groups involved, sectors, decision support tools (participatory and economic), and funding sources. A further nine case studies are then explored in more detail in regard to measure selection and methods.

Experiences of Bottom-up Adaptation Approaches in Europe and Beyond

Year 2015

Language

English

Authorship

Andreas Hastrup Clemmensen

Anne Haugvaldstad

André Vizinho

Gil Penha-Lopes

Credits

Contributing authors:

Søren Gram, Roos M. den Uyl, Anders Branth Pedersen, Mette Termansen, Oliver Gebhardt, Volker Meyer, Zuzana Harmáčková, Eliška Lorencová, David Vačkář, Femke Schasfoort, Mark Zandvoort, Ad Jeuken, Rutger van de Brugge, Anne-Mari Rytkönen, Milla Mäenpää, Marta Olazabal, Pedro Iglesias, Sebastien Foudi, Marc Neumann, Jenny Tröltzsch, Margaretha Breil, Ana Iglesias, Sahran Higgins

Funding

European Commission, Directorate-General Research & Innovation (DG Research & Innovation), International

Year

2015

Dimension

167 pp.

Project

Bottom-Up Climate Adaptation Strategies for a Sustainable Europe (BASE)

Project ID

Table of contents

Click to show full table of contents

1 Introduction to Participation in Climate Change Adaptation
1.1 Objectives and Aim
1.2 Approach
1.3 Case study overview
2 Participatory Analysis of Case studies
2.1 Methodology for Participation Matrix Analysis
2.1.1 Participation Matrix Outline
2.1.2 Level of Participation
2.1.3 Stakeholder Groups involved in the participatory process
2.1.4 Definition of stakeholders
2.1.5 Adaptation Phases
2.2 Case studies placed in the Participation Matrix
2.2.1 Cornwall
2.2.2 Dartmoor
2.2.3 Holstebro
2.2.4 Jena
2.2.5 Lake Ijsselmeer Region
2.2.6 Lolland
2.2.7 Prague
2.2.8 South Devon Coast
2.2.9 South Moravian Region
2.2.10 Timmendorfer Strand
2.2.11 U.K. Health
2.2.12 Ústí Region
2.2.13 Venice
2.2.14 Alentejo
2.2.15 South Aveiro Coast
2.2.16 Cascais
2.2.17 Copenhagen
2.2.18 Green Roof, Šumava Region
2.2.19 Kalajoki River Basin
2.2.20 Kalundborg
2.2.21 Rotterdam
2.2.22 Tagus River Water District, Madrid
2.3 Overall observations
2.3.1 How far are the case studies in the climate adaptation work?
2.3.2 Stakeholders involved in the adaptation phases
2.3.3 Level of participation
2.4 Objectives for the interaction of stakeholders
2.4.1 Development of adaptation options, strategies or plans
2.4.2 Analyse current adaptation actions
2.4.3 Assess consequences of adaptation options
2.4.4 Conflict Resolution
2.4.5 Knowledge Exchange
2.4.6 Communicate
2.4.7 Decision making
2.4.8 Implementation of adaptation measures
2.4.9 Evaluation of implemented adaptation actions
3 Participatory Methods in Climate Change Adaptation
3.1 Participatory Methods
3.2 Participatory methods used
3.2.1 Stakeholder workshop
3.2.2 World Café
3.2.3 Participatory add-ons to Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
3.2.4 Systematization of experiences
3.2.5 Design Workshops
3.2.6 Citizen summit
3.2.7 Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping
3.2.8 Scenario workshop
3.2.9 Dynamic Adaptive Policy Pathways
3.3 Methodologies developed within BASE project:
3.3.1 SWAP – Scenario Workshop & Adaptation Pathways
3.3.2 Participatory Benefit-Cost Analysis (PBCA)
4 Analysis of Deliberate Participation Processes
4.1 Methodology for case study analysis
4.2 Case study analysis of deliberate participation process
4.2.1 Alentejo
4.2.2 South Aveiro Coast
4.2.3 Cascais
4.2.4 Copenhagen
4.2.5 Green Roof, Sumava Region
4.2.6 Kalajoki River Basin
4.2.7 Kalundborg
4.2.8 Rotterdam
4.2.9 Tagus River Basin, Madrid
5 Conclusions and recommendations
5.1 Policy makers
5.1.1 Guidelines to achieve successful participation
5.1.2 Opportunities of applying participation
5.2 Practitioners
5.2.1 Recommendations to practitioners
5.3 Concluding remarks
6 References
7 Annex 1: Summary of methods to support participatory planning, implementation,
evaluation and monitoring
8 Annex 2: Reporting Structure

Keywords

Adaptation

Climate

Governance

Adaptation, climate change, sustainability, Europe, cost-benefit analysis, stakeholder commitment, effectiveness of political instruments, knowledge transfer, bottom-up, top-down, environmental governance

Europe, United States, Singapore, Brazil, Peru, Alentejo, South Aveiro Coast, Cascais, Copenhagen, Sumava Region, Kalajoki River Basin, Kalundborg, Rotterdam, Tagus River Basin, Madrid, Cornwall, Dartmoor, Holstebro, Jena, Lake Ijsselmeer Region, Lolland, Prague, South Devon Coast, South Moravian Region, Timmendorfer Strand, U.K. Health, Ústí Region, Venice, Alentejo, South Aveiro Coast, Cascais

case studies

Further Links

BASE project website

PublicationPolicy BriefDefinition of a Data Collection Process for Bottom-up Monitoring

multEE Policy Brief Nr. 3

Efficient energy policies rely strongly on consistent and comparable data provided by a sound data collection process and robust monitoring and verification (M&V) procedures. The third multEE policy brief presents five concrete policy recommendations to guarantee an... Read more

Andreas Prahl (ed.) 2017: Definition of a data collection process for bottom-up monitoring. multEE Policy Brief No.3

PublicationReportExperiences of Bottom-up Adaptation Approaches in Europe and Beyond

Boteler, Benjamin; Katrina Abhold; Jenny Tröltzsch et al. 2015: Experiences of Bottom-up Adaptation Approaches in Europe and Beyond. BASE Deliverable 4.2.