Incineration as Recovery and Disposal of Waste

Analysis and interpretation of the judgements of the European Court of Justice C-458/00 and C-228/00

Publikation: Policy Brief
Zitiervorschlag: Hansen, Wenke und Peter Beyer 2003: Incineration as recovery and disposal of waste: Analysis and interpretation of the judgements of the European Court of Justice C-458/00 and C-228/00. IEEP/Ecologic.

Hansen, Wenke und Peter Beyer 2003: Incineration as recovery and disposal of waste: Analysis and interpretation of the judgements of the European Court of Justice C-458/00 and C-228/00. IEEP/Ecologic.

Mehr Inhalte aus diesem Projekt

Zurück Pause Weiter

Publikation:Bericht

Hansen, Wenke; Maria Christopher und Maic Verbuecheln 2004: Es Atlieku Tvarkymo Politika ir Regionines ir Vientines Valdzios Institutuciju Uzdaviniai. Ecologic Institut, Aplinkosaugos valdymo ir technologiju centras (ECAT-Lietuva), Kaunas.

Es Atlieku Tvarkymo Politika ir Regionines ir Vientines Valdzios Institutuciju Uzdaviniai

Jahr 2004

Publikation:Dokument

Hansen, Wenke; Tanja Dräger und Ruta Landgrebe 2004: Capacity Building on the Community's Environmental Policy. EU Legislation on river basin management and the reduction of nutrient pollution. Ecologic - Institute for International and European Environmental Policy, Berlin.

Capacity Building on the European Community's Environmental Policy

EU Legislation on river basin management and the reduction of nutrient pollution

Jahr 2004

Sprache: Englisch
Autorenschaft: Dr. Peter Beyer

Wenke Schönfelder
Finanzierung: Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt (DBU), Deutschland

Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Landesentwicklung und Umweltfragen, Deutschland
Verlag: Ecologic Institut, Deutschland
Jahr: 2003
Umfang: 11 S.
Projekt: Kommunale Abfallentsorgung in Lettland und Litauen
Projekt-ID: 1921
Inhaltsverzeichnis: Gesamtes Inhaltsverzeichnis

1 Introduction
2 Summary and Background of the Rulings
2.1 Belgian Cement Kilns
2.2 Strasbourg Incinerator
3 Legal Interpretation and Consequences of the Rulings
3.1 Binding character of the judgements
3.2 Assessment of the criteria and definition
3.2.1 The principal objective of the combustion process
3.2.2 Replacing the use of a source of primary energy
4 Key reactions
5 Summary: Interpretation and Conclusions
5.1 Main conclusions of the Court
5.2 Possible economic, political and legal impact
5.3 Proposals for policy options
Schlüsselwörter: Ressourcenschonung + Kreislaufwirtschaft