Print

Schiedsgerichtshof für Investitionsstreitigkeiten

Lösung für fairen internationalen Investitionsschutz?

Publication
Citation

Nils Meyer-Ohlendorf (2015): Schiedsgerichtshof für Investitionsstreitigkeiten – Lösung für fairen internationalen Investitionsschutz?

Investment protection and investment tribunals are among the most contentious subjects of TTIP and CETA. Could a permanent Court of Arbitration address the problems of ad hoc tribunals? In this comment (German only), Nils Meyer-Ohlendorf discusses the pro and cons of a permanent Court of Arbitration. The comment is available for download.

Permanent Court of Arbitration – Solution for Fair International Investment Protection?
Language
German
Authorship
Year
Dimension
3 S.
Keywords
PublicationDocumentComments on Investment Protection under CETA
 
Is the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) the beginning of a new era of investment protection under free trade agreements, one that addresses long standing concerns surrounding investment protection? The answer to these questions is, by and large, no.... Read more

Nils Meyer-Ohlendorf (2014): Comments Investment Protection under CETA: Good or bad; new or old?.

PublicationReportENVI Relevant Legislative Areas of the EU-US Trade and Investment Partnership Negotiations (TTIP)
 
A recent study provides the members of the European Parliament Committee on Environment, Public Health, and Food Safety (ENVI Committee) with the needed expertise to monitor the ongoing negotiations between the United States and the European Commission for the... Read more

Mudgal, Shailendra et al. 2014: ENVI Relevant Legislative Areas of the EU-US Trade and Investment Partnership Negotiations (TTIP). BIO by Deloitte, Ecologic Institute, Institute for European Environmental Policy. ISBN: 978-92-823-6137-5 (paper), 978-92-823-6136-8 (pdf).

PublicationArticleViel Schatten, wenig Licht
 
In this article, published in the journal Frankfurter Hefte, Christiane Gerstetter from Ecologic Instiute takes a stand on environmental aspects in the discussion on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) that is currently negotiated between the EU... Read more

Gerstetter, Christiane 2014: "Viel Schatten, wenig Licht - TTIP aus Umweltsicht.". Frankfurter Hefte, Vol. 2014, No. 10, 37-41.

PublicationDocumentEcologic Staff Participates in EU Consultation on Investment Protection in TTIP
 
Christiane Gerstetter and Max Grünig, Senior Fellows at the Ecologic Institute, have prepared a submission for the EU Commission's online consultation on investment protection in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). The submission is available for... Read more

Gerstetter, Christiane and Max Grünig 2014: Investment protection and investor-to-state dispute settlement (ISDS) in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Agreement (TTIP) Contribution to the EU Commission’s "Online public consultation on investment protection and investor-to-state dispute settlement (ISDS) in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Agreement (TTIP), Berlin.

PublicationReportRegulatory Cooperation under TTIP – a Risk for Democracy and National Regulation?
 
This study conducted by Ecologic Institute with support from the Heinrich Boell Foundation aims at providing factual background to the debate on regulatory cooperation within the TTIP. The study looks at whether fears are justified that regulatory cooperation could lead... Read more

Gerstetter, Christiane; Lena Donat; Katharina Klaas and Katherine Weingartner 2014: Regulatory Cooperation under TTIP – a Risk for Democracy and National Regulation?, Berlin.

ProjectRegulatory Cooperation under TTIP – a Risk for Democracy and National Regulation?
 
Fotolia © argus
Ecologic Institute with support from the Heinrich Boell Foundation compiled a study to provide factual background to the debate on regulatory cooperation under TTIP. The study contains an overview of existing models for achieving regulatory harmonisation, with a focus... Read more

Regulatory Cooperation under TTIP – a Risk for Democracy and National Regulation?

Duration
-
Funding
Source URL: https://www.ecologic.eu/11941